A- de 2019
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Carlos Libardo Bernal Pulido
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Negar por cuanto no se desconoció precedente constitucional
- Requisitos formales y materiales de procedencia
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia C-138/18.
La demandante en el proceso que dio origen a la providencia de la referencia invocó como causal de nulidad el cambio irregular de jurisprudencia.
Específicamente adujo que la Corte cambió injustificadamente el procedente contenido en la Sentencia C-328/13.
La Corte consideró que con el fallo cuestionado no se cambió de manera irregular la jurisprudencia contenida en la providencia C-328/13 y, por ello, decidió NEGAR la nulidad formulada.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. NEGAR LA SOLICITUD NULIDAD de la sentencia C-138 del 28 de noviembre de 2018, proferida por la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional.
- Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.